BMJ  2004;329:1043 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1043

Letter

General practitioners say that evidence based information is changing practice

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—As the publishers of the BMJ's Clinical Evidence we have more than a passing interest in the extent to which the provision of evidenced based information changes clinical practice. In this context, the results of an evaluation of Clinical Evidence commissioned by us assumed some importance.

A total of 5960 general practitioners in England were contacted by Stingray Research, an independent market research company, and asked to provide some broad perceptions about the role of evidence in their day to day practice and to pass judgment on Clinical Evidence. The response rate was 838/5960 (14.1%).

Some findings were not surprising. Seventy five per cent of general practitioner respondents reported that their patients were likely to show interest in the latest research findings. Ninety seven per cent of the general practitioners had used an information resource to find the latest evidence, and 45% expected to do so at . . . [Full text of this article]

David Tovey, deputy editor, Clinical Evidence

dtovey@bmjgroup.com

Fiona Godlee, head, BMJ Knowledge

BMJ Publishing Group, London WC1H 9JR


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Relevant Article

More on compulsory registration of clinical trials: Complete clinical trial register is already reality for paediatrics
M Bonati, C Pandolfini DEC-net collaborative group
BMJ 2005 330: 480. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ