Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1043 (30 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1043
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAs the publishers of the BMJ's Clinical Evidence we have more than a passing interest in the extent to which the provision of evidenced based information changes clinical practice. In this context, the results of an evaluation of Clinical Evidence commissioned by us assumed some importance.
A total of 5960 general practitioners in England were contacted by Stingray Research, an independent market research company, and asked to provide some broad perceptions about the role of evidence in their day to day practice and to pass judgment on Clinical Evidence. The response rate was 838/5960 (14.1%).
Some findings were not surprising. Seventy five per cent of general practitioner respondents reported that their patients were likely to show interest in the latest research findings. Ninety seven per cent of the general practitioners had used an information resource to find the latest evidence, and 45% expected to do so at
David Tovey, deputy editor, Clinical Evidence
dtovey@bmjgroup.com
Fiona Godlee, head, BMJ Knowledge
BMJ Publishing Group, London WC1H 9JR