Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:979 (23 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7472.979
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORKoning and van der Wouden in their editorial on treatment of impetigo discuss the relative merits of systemic and topical antibiotics that were reported in their recent Cochrane review and add that they have no evidence to support the therapeutic value of disinfecting agents, which they note have hardly been studied.1 They comment that studies establishing the value of disinfecting agents are therefore most welcome.
Generations of general practitioners have treated impetigo with gentian violet, and although there has been some trial evidence that its effectiveness extends to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,2 the main support for its use is clinical experience passed on from one practitioner to the next and reinforced by the rapid resolution they see when failures with more cosmetically acceptable topical antibiotic preparations lead to a trial of gentian violet.
The processes developing evidence based practice must be able to promote those treatments that
Roderic S MacDonald, specialist in musculoskeletal medicine
London W4 2NL rodmacdonald@blueyonder.co.uk