Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:978 (23 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7472.978-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe attitude towards methicillin resistant Staphylococus aureus (MRSA) in the United Kingdom is a case of shutting the gate after the horse has bolted. Voss says that in Scandinavia and the Netherlands, where the prevalence of MRSA is low, a screening and decolonisation policy for healthcare workers is advocated.1
My experience of working outside the United Kingdom (in Australia) was that people are unable to work with patients without being screened and cleared. Having worked in England in medicine for over 12 years I have never once been screened. Surely we should at least be adopting this policy to help combat the problem?
Patients themselves must shoulder some of the blame for bringing MRSA into hospitals. It would be a mammoth task to screen the entire hospital population, but a staggered approach would be a start. Screening elective surgical patients before admission could be the first step, then
Nicholas Akerman, research registrar
St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF nik_lucy@hotmail.com