Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:930-932 (23 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7472.930
Statements about the damaging effects of radiation on learning were erroneous
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Apaper published recently in the BMJ reported results from a historical study of intellectual capacity in people receiving head and neck radiotherapy before the age of 18 months.1 Hall et al concluded that the severity of intellectual impairment was a dose dependent result of radiotherapy. They further commented that radiation doses associated with contemporary diagnostic computed tomography of the head were comparable with radiotherapy doses quoted from their study and concluded that this was a cause for concern. The "What this paper adds" box stated: "Diagnostic evaluation of children with minor head injuries by computed tomography needs to be re-evaluated." We believe that the data presented in the paper do not support that conclusion. For "This week in the BMJ," the chosen the headline was: "Computed tomography scanning in infancy may affect later learning." This was unfortunate, as the paper did not address that topic. Equally unfortunately, the press
Paul D Griffiths, professor of radiology, University of Sheffield
Section of Academic Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF (p.griffiths@sheffield.ac.uk)
Giles D Morrison, radiology protection adviser
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU