Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:916 (16 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7471.916
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe BMJ ethics committee's revised policy on consent to the publication of patient information is laudable,1 but an important matter remains overlooked: publishing cases involving incompetent patients. Much can be learnt from these cases; be it highlighting clinical difficulties or drawing attention to neglected moral issues. But the guidelines as written may make it impossible to publish them.
Imagine I wished to publish a case involving a traceable adult with learning disability who had requested genetic counselling. Turning to the guidelines, I would be required to obtain her consent before publication. However, obtaining written informed consent from adults with questionable competence could be difficult or exploitative, as they may lack the capacity to understand the implications of consent to publication. Furthermore, the exceptions listed under point 3 do not apply. Merely anonymising her information would be ethically problematic, as could drafting a fictional case "inspired" by the clinical
-->
Ainsley J Newson, postdoctoral associate in clinical ethics and genetics
Medical Ethics Unit, Imperial College London and London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, London W6 8RP a.newson@imperial.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses