BMJ 2004;329:871-872 (16 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7471.871
Editorial
Primary care trusts
Premature reorganisation, with mergers, may be harmful
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Just over two years ago, in a reorganisation of the NHS in England, 303 primary care trusts were created, each with responsibility for providing primary health care, improving health, and commissioning secondary care services for a population of around 180 000. With about 80% of NHS funding flowing directly to primary care trusts on a capitation based formula, hopes were high that these new organisations would be powerful agents for change in a more devolved, clinically driven, and locally responsive NHS.1
Some in the NHS, however, believe that primary care trusts have failed to fulfil these expectations. There is a growing belief that many trusts are perhaps ineffective organisationstoo weak to stand up to providers of acute care in tough negotiations on commissioning and too small to fulfil their public health responsibilities. Some would argue that they have so far been unable to establish strong and credible management teams.2
The . . . [Full text of this article]
Kieran Walshe, professor of health policy and management
University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL (kieran.walshe@man.ac.uk)
Judith Smith, senior lecturer
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2RT
Jennifer Dixon, director of health policy
King's Fund, London W1G 0AN
Nigel Edwards, director of policy
NHS Confederation, 1 Warwick Row, London SW1E 5ER
David J Hunter, professor of health policy and management
Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, Queen's Campus, Thornaby, Stockton on Tees TS17 6BH
Nicholas Mays, professor of health policy
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Charles Normand, Edward Kennedy professor of health policy and management
Trinity College Dublin, 3-4 Foster Place, Dublin 2
Ray Robinson, professor of health policy
London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Primary care trusts: do they have a future?
- Judith Smith and Nicholas Mays
BMJ 2005 331: 1156-1157.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lewis, R., Smith, J., Harrison, A.
(2009). From quasi-market to market in the National Health Service in England: what does this mean for the purchasing of health services?. J Health Serv Res Policy
14: 44-51
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Plochg, T., Delnoij, D. M. J., Hogervorst, W. V. G., van Dijk, P., Belleman, S., Klazinga, N. S.
(2006). Local health systems in 21st century: who cares?--an exploratory study on health system governance in Amsterdam. Eur J Public Health
16: 559-564
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Hobson, R. J., Sewell, G. J.
(2006). Supplementary prescribing by pharmacists in England. Am J Health Syst Pharm
63: 244-253
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Smith, J., Mays, N.
(2005). Primary care trusts: do they have a future?. BMJ
331: 1156-1157
[Full text]
-
Ferrer, R. L., Hambidge, S. J., Maly, R. C.
(2005). The Essential Role of Generalists in Health Care Systems. ANN INTERN MED
142: 691-699
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Feachem, R. G A, Sekhri, N. K
(2005). Moving towards true integration. BMJ
330: 787-788
[Full text]
-
Normand, C.
(2004). Encouraging and not discouraging nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing
9: 462-463
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Here we go again
- Sergio A Battistessa
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- A bigger picture
- Keith J Edgar
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- The Primary Care Trust - an inappropriate body to fund secondary care
- Nicholas M Wilson
bmj.com, 17 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Its the complexity, stupid!
- Steven Ford
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Primary care trusts are a flawed model for service integration
- Laurence A Malcolm
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Whatever happened to evidence-based policy?
- Marcus J Longley
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- We need to be prepared to expect and accept the inevitable
- Padmanabhan Badrinath
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Victims or benificiaries?
- Andrew J Wall
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Zen Buddhism in the NHS
- Stephen f Hayes
bmj.com, 19 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- After wars and fox hunting - it must be healthcare
- David A R de Berker
bmj.com, 20 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Re: Zen Buddhism in the NHS
- Peter Morrell
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Mergers should not be delayed
- Richard M Vautrey
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2004
[Full text]
- Vaguely right is better than precisely wrong
- David P Kernick
bmj.com, 29 Oct 2004
[Full text]