Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:859 (9 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.859-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORProfessor Baum's open letter in response to the Prince of Wales's speech at a research symposium on complementary therapies and cancer care at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists sparked off some 80-odd responses.1 Practitioners of conventional medicine and of alternative and complementary medicine (sometimes both), former and current patients (who have much to say to recommend both approaches), journalists, social workers, clerics, and scientists worldwide all responded.
Those who agree unanimously with Professor Baum reject Prince Charles's proposals in no uncertain terms. But a count reveals that they are not the majorityand neither are those who fervently defend exclusively complementary approaches to cancer care. Most correspondents, regardless of which side of the fence they may be on, interpret the prince's speech as advocating an integrated approach, not the abandonment of reason, asking for complementary and alternative medicines to undergo the same rigorous trials as conventional treatments.
Birte Twisselmann, technical editor
BMJ
Read all Rapid Responses