BMJ  2004;329:857-858 (9 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.857-c

Letter

The prince and the professor

Integrated approach is needed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The Prince of Wales's keynote speech to the joint symposium, which this foundation, the National Cancer Research Institute, and four of the United Kingdom's leading cancer charities (Marie Curie Cancer Care, Bristol Cancer Help Centre, Macmillan Cancer Relief, and Breakthrough Breast Cancer) held in June, attracted considerable media attention.1 2 Much of the interest was generated by inaccurate and misleading reports of the speech.

We all want to understand what works and what doesn't, whether that be conventional, complementary, or alternative approaches to cancer.

As the Prince of Wales pointed out, if up to 80% of patients with cancer try complementary or alternative treatments after diagnosis then surely it makes sense to investigate their efficacy. The report by the Science and Technology Select Committee on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in December 2000 recommended that the Department of Health should provide dedicated research funding in this area to develop "centres . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

Michael Fox, chief executive

The Prince of Wales's Foundation for Integrated Health, London N7 8QJ Michael@fihealth.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

An open letter to the Prince of Wales: with respect, your highness, you've got it wrong
Michael Baum
BMJ 2004 329: 118. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Nonsensical barking?
Adrian S. Blaj
bmj.com, 9 Oct 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ