Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:857-858 (9 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.857-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe Prince of Wales's keynote speech to the joint symposium, which this foundation, the National Cancer Research Institute, and four of the United Kingdom's leading cancer charities (Marie Curie Cancer Care, Bristol Cancer Help Centre, Macmillan Cancer Relief, and Breakthrough Breast Cancer) held in June, attracted considerable media attention.1 2 Much of the interest was generated by inaccurate and misleading reports of the speech.
We all want to understand what works and what doesn't, whether that be conventional, complementary, or alternative approaches to cancer.
As the Prince of Wales pointed out, if up to 80% of patients with cancer try complementary or alternative treatments after diagnosis then surely it makes sense to investigate their efficacy. The report by the Science and Technology Select Committee on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in December 2000 recommended that the Department of Health should provide dedicated research funding in this area to develop "centres
-->
Michael Fox, chief executive
The Prince of Wales's Foundation for Integrated Health, London N7 8QJ Michael@fihealth.org.uk
Read all Rapid Responses