BMJ  2004;329:818 (9 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.818

News roundup

GMC appeals against judgment on withholding treatment

BMJ Clare Dyer legal correspondent

The General Medical Council filed an appeal last week against a high court ruling which has cast doubt on key aspects of the GMC’s guidance on the circumstances in which doctors can properly withhold or withdraw treatment which prolongs life.

The ruling was won last July by Leslie Burke, aged 44 (BMJ 2004;329:309, 7 Aug). He has cerebellar ataxia and told the court that he feared that doctors might withdraw artificial feeding and let him die if he lost the ability to communicate.

Ruling in his favour, Mr Justice Munby said the legal content of the guidance, issued in 2002, was "properly vulnerable" to criticism in some respects. It failed to acknowledge the duty of a doctor who was unable or unwilling to carry out the wishes of his patient to go on providing treatment until he could find another doctor who would do . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

GMC finds three doctors guilty of irresponsible prescribing to addicts
Owen Dyer
BMJ 2006 332: 747. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Why the GMC is right to appeal over life prolonging treatment
Raanan Gillon
BMJ 2004 329: 810-811. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Man wins battle to keep receiving life support
Owen Dyer
BMJ 2004 329: 309. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ