BMJ  2004;329:743 (25 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7468.743

Letter

Women in medicine

Women do not have to choose

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Heath's editorial on the increasing number of women in medicine and the resulting loss in status and influence of the profession was disappointing.1 She says that the hourly earnings of male and female doctors are very different. This is not surprising, given the higher percentage of men currently in senior positions. Are the hourly earnings of male and female senior house officers, registrars, and new consultants different? The answer is obviously no. The number of female consultants has risen by more than 50% in the past 10 years and is set to continue to do so.

What is the logic in saying that a feminised profession loses status and influence? We cannot compare ourselves with totalitarian societies such as the Soviet Union. Women do not have to choose between personal commitments and professional power. In a working life of 40 years, it is not a matter of great . . . [Full text of this article]

Clarissa Fabre, honorary secretary

Medical Women's Federation, London WC1H 9HX cdfabre@yahoo.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Women in medicine
Iona Heath
BMJ 2004 329: 412-413. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ