BMJ  2004;329:624 (11 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7466.624-a

Letter

Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom

Ask for help

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—I recently took a similar length of time as Wald to complete a 60 page COREC form, for a study comparing two different approaches to the management of cancer pain.1 Wald may have been unduly harsh about the process and available support.

Perhaps I have been lucky, but I have had invaluable help from our trust's research and effectiveness department, based at the Bristol Royal Infirmary. Involving them at the protocol development stage undoubtedly facilitated this. I have also received useful (and money saving) advice from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and, like Wald, was able to apply for a doctors' and dentists' exemption, which was rolled over to a clinical trials authorisation on 1 May, thereby saving some £2000. Because other researchers were doing likewise (the agency's workload was quadrupled for that period; personal communication, 2004), this unsurprisingly resulted in some delay in issuing the . . . [Full text of this article]

Colette M Reid, research fellow

Department of Palliative Medicine, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED colette.reid@bristol.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Bureaucracy of ethics applications
David S Wald
BMJ 2004 329: 282-284. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ