BMJ  2004;329:622 (11 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7466.622

Letter

Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom

Seeking a balance: response from the Department of Health and COREC

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Several articles about research ethics committees in the issue of 31 July have been constructive in advising about the need for change. Others have been less helpful, especially when based on error or misconception.

Nicholson claimed that research ethics committees may be unable to function because of political control.¹ There is not, and never has been, a proposal for "direct political control" of research ethics committee membership. The European Directive on Clinical Trials (directive 2001/20/EC) legally obliges all member states, including the United Kingdom, to "take the measures necessary for establishment and operation of ethics committees." The newly created United Kingdom Ethics Committee Authority simply comprises the four ministers of the countries in the United Kingdom who have until now been separately responsible for their NHS research ethics committee systems. His claim that results of UK research could not now be used for regulatory purposes is simply unfounded.

. . . [Full text of this article]

Department of Health, London SW1A 2NS Sally.Bishop@doh.gsi.gov.uk

Central Office of Research Ethics Committees, London W2 3QR

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population

Hester J T Ward, Simon N Cousens, Blaire Smith-Bathgate, Margaret Leitch, Dawn Everington, Robert G Will, and Peter G Smith
BMJ 2004 329: 277-279. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The other face of research governance

Alysun M Jones and Bryony Bamford
BMJ 2004 329: 280-281. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Bureaucracy of ethics applications

David S Wald
BMJ 2004 329: 282-284. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?

Konrad Jamrozik
BMJ 2004 329: 286-287. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders

M Parker, R Ashcroft, A O M Wilkie, and A Kent
BMJ 2004 329: 288-289. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Another threat to research in the United Kingdom

Richard Nicholson
BMJ 2004 328: 1212-1213. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Larkin, P. J, de Casterle, B. D., Schotsmans, P. (2008). A Relational Ethical Dialogue With Research Ethics Committees. Nurs Ethics 15: 234-242 [Abstract]  
• Califf, R. M (2006). Clinical trials bureaucracy: unintended consequences of well-intentioned policy. Clin Trials 3: 496-502 [Abstract]  
• Hill, J., Foster, N., Hughes, R., Hay, E. (2005). Meeting the challenges of research governance. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44: 571-572 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

New ethics form will kill off normal volunteer studies in the universities and the NHS - is change possible?

Jan K. Melichar
bmj.com, 14 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Research Bureacracy-- a damaging divide between researchers and administrators

David S Wald
bmj.com, 17 Sep 2004 [Full text]

What beaurocracy - my research doesn't require ethical approval!

Phillip A. Smith, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]

Speeding up ethical and Trust approval - use risk assessment

Phillip A. Smith, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Oct 2004 [Full text]

Developing the face of research governance

Tony Soteriou, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]