Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:590 (11 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7466.590
BMJ Jocalyn Clark
American policies on international health were condemned last week for being based on ideology rather than science; for rolling back progress achieved in protecting sexual and reproductive health and rights; for increasing the risk of unwanted pregnancies, HIV infection, and unsafe abortions; and for “condemning millions of women to die.”
Seven hundred participants from 109 countries gathered in London to review progress on the Cairo Consensus, a programme of action ratified by 179 nation states at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). The programme, which was designed to achieve sexual and reproductive rights for all by 2015, is now at the halfway point of its 20 year task. It is credited with introducing a human rights framework to population control.
Delegates at the conference heard that although once the United States was a champion of the programme and an important funder of family planning
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses