BMJ  2004;329:524-525 (4 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7465.524

Editorial

Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination

Better vaccines are needed if vaccination is to be made compulsory

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Taken at face value the use of vaccines to prevent the effects of serious infections caused by a terrorist attack appears a sensible policy. In 1997 the United States Department of Defense initiated the compulsory anthrax vaccine immunisation programme to immunise 2.4m military personnel.¹ In December 2002 a similar programme, also involving civilians, was started against smallpox. In the first five and half months the Department of Defense administered 450 293 doses of smallpox vaccine.² United States military personnel engaged in military operations in Iraq are immunised against smallpox and anthrax. As in any vaccination campaign, the incidence of the target disease and the characteristics of available vaccines are two key elements in decision making.

Naturally occurring anthrax is a rare disease. It occurs mostly in cutaneous form among those exposed to animal products (such as hides) and causes a rare and rapidly fatal—if untreated—respiratory illness (inhalation anthrax). Inhalation . . . [Full text of this article]

Cochrane Vaccines Field, Via Adige 28a, 00061 Anguillara Sabazia, Rome, Italy (Toj1@aol.com)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: United States continues vaccinating to keep troops healthy

John D Grabenstein and William Winkenwerder, Jr
BMJ 2004 329: 977. [Extract] [Full Text]

Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: Arguments for current vaccines are based on inadequate support for older vaccines

Walter R Schumm
BMJ 2004 329: 977-978. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Schumm, W R, Nazarinia, R R, Bosch, K R (2009). Unanswered questions and ethical issues concerning US biodefence research. J. Med. Ethics 35: 594-598 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Weiss, M. M., Weiss, P. D., Weiss, J. B. (2007). Anthrax Vaccine and Public Health Policy. AJPH 97: 1945-1951 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dyer, O. (2004). US judge halts compulsory anthrax vaccination for soldiers. BMJ 329: 1062-1062 [Full text]  
• Grabenstein, J. D, Winkenwerder, W. Jr (2004). Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: United States continues vaccinating to keep troops healthy. BMJ 329: 977-977 [Full text]  
• Schumm, W. R (2004). Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: Arguments for current vaccines are based on inadequate support for older vaccines. BMJ 329: 977-978 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The medical response to terrorism

Ian Roberts
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Vaccinating to Keep Troops Healthy

John D. Grabenstein, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Scientific evidence and its political use

Tom Jefferson
bmj.com, 27 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination revisited: arguments for current vaccines based on inadequate support for older vaccines

Walter R Schumm
bmj.com, 29 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>