BMJ  2004;329:412-413 (21 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7463.412

Editorial

Women in medicine

Continuing unequal status of women may reduce the influence of the profession

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In a recent interview with the Independent newspaper, Professor Carol Black, president of the Royal College of Physicians, expressed concern that the increasing number of women within medicine might lead to the profession losing influence and status. This received widespread media coverage and was portrayed as an astonishing position for a woman to adopt, with the clear implication that it was antifeminist. But is her concern valid?

Few countries—notably Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, the Netherlands, and Germany—have made substantial progress towards sexual equality and women's empowerment, and the United Kingdom is not one of them.¹ In this regrettable situation it seems highly likely that Carol Black is right and that a profession that becomes feminised risks the loss of status and influence.

Women working full time in Great Britain in April 2003 earned only 82% of the average full time earnings of men, and this gender pay gap in . . . [Full text of this article]

Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

A diverse profession

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women in medicine: Doctors of both sexes are seeking balance between life and work

S F Gray
BMJ 2004 329: 742-743. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women in medicine: Women do not have to choose

Clarissa Fabre
BMJ 2004 329: 743. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women in medicine: Sexism is not only reason for women's "unequal status" in the workplace

Kingsley R Browne
BMJ 2004 329: 743. [Extract] [Full Text]

Women in medicine: Status cannot be the driver

Des Spence
BMJ 2004 329: 743. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Reichenbach, L., Brown, H. (2004). Gender and academic medicine: impacts on the health workforce. BMJ 329: 792-795 [Full text]  
• Fabre, C. (2004). Women in medicine: Women do not have to choose. BMJ 329: 743-743 [Full text]  
• Gray, S F (2004). Women in medicine: Doctors of both sexes are seeking balance between life and work. BMJ 329: 742-743 [Full text]  
• Browne, K. R (2004). Women in medicine: Sexism is not only reason for women's "unequal status" in the workplace. BMJ 329: 743-743 [Full text]  
• Spence, D. (2004). Women in medicine: Status cannot be the driver. BMJ 329: 743-743 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The real causes of losing influence, status, and dignity of our profession.

Sergio Stagnaro
bmj.com, 20 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Attacking Women for Doing Well?

Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 20 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Diversity is required

Deborah J Verran
bmj.com, 21 Aug 2004 [Full text]

A 'Very Black Day' For Competent Female Professionals . . .

Joseph . C . Obi
bmj.com, 21 Aug 2004 [Full text]

women in medicine

naheed nabi
bmj.com, 23 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Women in medicine: Sexism is not the only reason for women's "unequal status" in the workplace

Kingsley R. Browne
bmj.com, 23 Aug 2004 [Full text]

I'm alright Gill

susanne mccabe
bmj.com, 24 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Status Quo

Des Spence
bmj.com, 25 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Women in Medicine

Dr Clarissa Fabre
bmj.com, 26 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Women in General Practice

Francesco Carelli
bmj.com, 28 Aug 2004 [Full text]

Women in Medicine

SF Gray
bmj.com, 1 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Too much Weber, not enough Gramsci?

Steve Iliffe
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>