Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:402 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.402-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe paper by Harvey at al shows several inconsistencies.1 The first line contains an error: most patients with Helicobacter pylori actually have a mild pangastritis with normal or decreased intragastric acidity; the antral inflammation stimulates hypergastrinaemia but is balanced by a relative suppression of acid secretion by the oxyntic body, and duodenal ulcer occurs in only 10% of infected patients.2
The authors seem confused as to whether they are assessing gastrooesophageal reflux disease, as claimed, or occasional symptoms. The prevalence of symptoms once a month, the authors' definition, is very high and may not be pathological. Authorities propose that heartburn twice a week is a more reasonable definition of reflux disease.3
If the study was designed to address the question of H pylori and reflux the structure is suboptimal. Well validated questionnaires designed specifically for reflux symptoms are available.4 Reflux is more severe in elderly people,4
5 and by
Ian L P Beales, senior lecturer
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich NR4 7TJ ian.beales@uea.ac.uk