Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:399-400 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.399
Duncan Forrest, retired consultant paediatric surgeon1, James Barrett, consultant psychiatrist1
1 Health Professionals' Network, Amnesty International UK London EC1R 4RE
Correspondence to: D Forrest steve.ballinger@amnesty.org.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Many clinicians will have memories of slightly disturbing encountersperhaps while in trainingwhen they felt that a patient was suffering unnecessarily thoughtless, humiliating, or frankly brutal treatment. It is difficult for junior doctors to make a complaint. Perhaps it becomes slightly easier with growing experience and seniority, but it is never straightforward and many encounters go by without protest. Although ethical norms have improved in recent years, there are still many working environments where doctors daily witness doubtful practices and have to decide whether to confront or ignore them.1 When should you blow the whistle?
Doctors whose work involves divided loyalties, such as police surgeons, prison doctors, or medical officers in the armed forces, are most likely to encounter these ethical problems. Of course, in countries where torture is practised, doctors in such jobs face more serious choices and risks than doctors in the NHS. If they do not cooperate with
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses