BMJ  2004;329:359-360 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.359

Editorial

Vaginal delivery after caesarean section

Determining thresholds for risks requires more than uterine rupture rates

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Once considered unthinkable, vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section remains a safe option for many women. One of the greatest concerns for patients, providers, hospitals, and policy makers with regard to vaginal delivery after prior caesarean is the potential for devastating consequences such as perinatal death from uterine rupture. Although the risk factors associated with uterine rupture have been investigated often, few studies have attempted to measure mortality and morbidity directly related to uterine rupture, and none has examined whether outcomes related to uterine rupture are related to the number of births per year in the hospital. This editorial discusses the current evidence regarding risk factors for catastrophic uterine rupture and possible preventive measures, and considers the importance of framing risk in policy, and discussions between provider and patient.

Uterine rupture remains a rare event

In this issue Smith et al present population based data from the Scottish birth registry, confirming that uterine rupture . . . [Full text of this article]

Association is not causation


Prevention strategies


International collaboration and improved outcome measures


Framing risk under conditions of uncertainty


Jeanne-Marie Guise, associate professor

Oregon Health and Science University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UHN-50, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA (guisej@ohsu.edu)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study
Gordon C S Smith, Jill P Pell, Dharmintra Pasupathy, and Richard Dobbie
BMJ 2004 329: 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Were we irresponsible or are obstetricans unjustifiably alarmist?
Richard D Colman
bmj.com, 22 Aug 2004 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview