Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:359-360 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.359
Determining thresholds for risks requires more than uterine rupture rates
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Once considered unthinkable, vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section remains a safe option for many women. One of the greatest concerns for patients, providers, hospitals, and policy makers with regard to vaginal delivery after prior caesarean is the potential for devastating consequences such as perinatal death from uterine rupture. Although the risk factors associated with uterine rupture have been investigated often, few studies have attempted to measure mortality and morbidity directly related to uterine rupture, and none has examined whether outcomes related to uterine rupture are related to the number of births per year in the hospital. This editorial discusses the current evidence regarding risk factors for catastrophic uterine rupture and possible preventive measures, and considers the importance of framing risk in policy, and discussions between provider and patient.
In this issue Smith et al present population based data from the Scottish birth registry, confirming that uterine rupture
Jeanne-Marie Guise, associate professor
Oregon Health and Science University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UHN-50, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA (guisej@ohsu.edu)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+