Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:350 (7 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7461.350
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORLike Mohammed et al, we investigated several general practitioners (GPs) who signalled as having "unacceptably" high death rates in the study undertaken by Aylin et al.1 2 We also concluded that these higher than expected death rates were explained by a "nursing home effect."
|
|
Credit: JOHN GILES/PA
|
Our methods included calculating standardised mortality ratios for each general practitioner's registered population, and reviewing the case notes of dead patients. The review was conducted by two independent general practitioners using a structured form, based on that used in the original audit of Harold Shipman's practice.3
Identifying a nursing home effect is in itself an inadequate conclusion to an investigation of this type as quality of care may also be poor in this environment. Review of case notes, as a mechanism for formulating an impression of the quality of patients' care, is an essential, albeit resource intensive, adjunct to a purely statistical
Julie Billett, specialist trainee in public health
juliebillett@yahoo.co.uk
Nick Kendall, assistant director of public health
Adur, Arun and Worthing Primary Care Trust, Goring by Sea, Worthing BN12 6BT
Peter Old, associate director
National Clinical Assessment Authority, London SW8 5NQ
Read all Rapid Responses