Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:303-304 (7 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7461.303
General practitioners should be allowed some discretion and humane flexibility
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doctors are familiar with ethical dilemmas. The tension of irreconcilable imperatives is a permanent feature of most of our working lives. For example, our professional ethics teach us to treat patients according to need, but in the context of a publicly funded service, resources will always be insufficient. The introduction of identity cards, dovetailing with plans to change the regulations governing eligibility for free NHS primary care, are nevertheless likely to intensify these dilemmas for general practitioners and some hospital doctors.1 2
Eligibility to free health care is quite properly a political question, to be decided by due democratic process. Crudely speaking, the NHS is a giant national risk poolan insurance policyand those who have not contributed, to the extent of their means and ability, should not draw on its reserves. We are properly indignant at those affluent foreigners who visit the United Kingdom because they do not wish to claim
Julian Sheather, ethics adviser
British Medical Association, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR
Iona Heath, general practitioner
Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP
Read all Rapid Responses