Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:293 (31 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7460.293
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn their systematic review Liu et al show that epidural analgesia does not increase the caesarean section rate, which is welcome.1 Unlike previous meta-analyses, this one included only studies of nulliparous women receiving low concentration epidural infusions, in order to re-examine their effect on instrumental vaginal delivery, in the belief that low concentration infusions of local anaesthetic are associated with fewer abnormal deliveries than higher concentrations.
|
|
Credit: BSP LAURENT/SPL
|
They cite the COMET trial, which could compare only low and high dose bolus administration.2 There have been at least five other randomised comparisons of low and high dose boluses, three showing no significant difference in delivery outcome, but aggregation of all the data shows a significant effect.3 By contrast none out of six comparisons of low (usually 0.0625% bupivacaine) and high concentration infusions showed a difference in delivery type, despite randomising over 800 women.3 Had any randomised trials
Felicity Reynolds, emeritus professor of obstetric anaesthesia
St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH felicity.reynolds@btinternet.com
Read all Rapid Responses