Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:244-245 (31 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7460.244
Is quick, cheap, and accurate when used appropriately
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) entails using a narrow gauge (25-22G) needle to collect a sample of a lesion for microscopic examination. It allows a minimally invasive, rapid diagnosis of tissue but does not preserve its histological architecture. In some cases this limits the ability to make a definitive diagnosis. As with any invasive procedure there are risks, and as with all diagnostic tests involving sampling and interpretation, important diagnoses can be missed. False negative results and occasional complications of the technique have been reported as proof that it is "useless and dangerous."1 However, accuracy and complications need to be compared with robust published data about alternative techniques before abandoning fine needle aspiration. Clinicians require clear communication with the cytopathologist to ensure that the procedure is appropriate for the question being addressed and that both understand the answer in the same terms. The rapid diagnosis possible with fine needle aspiration
Derek E Roskell, consultant pathologist
(derek.roskell@orh.nhs.uk)
Ian D Buley, consultant pathologist
Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
Read all Rapid Responses