BMJ 2004;329:241-242 (31 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7460.241
Editorial
Clinical research under the cosh again
This time it is ethics committees
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Today the BMJ publishes a clutch of papers on the regulation of clinical research by ethics committees.1-5 All describe, in one way or another, how ethics committee review may impede and delay research, sometimes even to distort the methods so much that the conclusions are flawed and patients damagedan unintended unethical consequence.
Although this is not just a problem in the United Kingdom, to know exactly what is going on in other countries is difficult. If the situation is anything like that in the United Kingdom it will be confusing, changing all the time (just last month the UK government notably altered its human tissue bill), and made even more confusing by varying guidance from official bodies such as the General Medical Council and the BMA. Clearly, international differences are a particular problem for multicentre research across national boundaries. For example, unlike in the United Kingdom, the United States has . . . [Full text of this article]
Charles Warlow, professor
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU (charles.warlow@ed.ac.uk)

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Ethics of collecting and using healthcare data
- Derick Wade
BMJ 2007 334: 1330-1331.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Research governance: Research governance approval is putting people off research
- Niall Galbraith, Carol Hawley, and Valerie De-Souza
BMJ 2006 332: 238.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
My last choice
- Richard Smith
BMJ 2004 329: 0.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population
- Hester J T Ward, Simon N Cousens, Blaire Smith-Bathgate, Margaret Leitch, Dawn Everington, Robert G Will, and Peter G Smith
BMJ 2004 329: 277-279.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Campaign to revitalise academic medicine: Don't believe us
- David L Sackett
BMJ 2004 329: 294.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Campaign to revitalise academic medicine: Is the bubble due to burst for medical research funding?
- Bruce G Charlton and Peter Andras
BMJ 2004 329: 294.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Angell, E, Dixon-Woods, M
(2009). Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?. J. Med. Ethics
35: 130-132
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Richardson, S., McMullan, M.
(2007). Research Ethics in the UK: What Can Sociology Learn from Health?. Sociology
41: 1115-1132
[Abstract]
-
Wade, D.
(2007). Ethics of collecting and using healthcare data. BMJ
334: 1330-1331
[Full text]
-
Macduff, C., McKie, A., Martindale, S., Rennie, A. M., West, B., Wilcock, S.
(2007). A Novel Framework for Reflecting on the Functioning of Research Ethics Review Panels. Nurs Ethics
14: 99-116
[Abstract]
-
Galbraith, N., Hawley, C., De-Souza, V.
(2006). Research governance: Research governance approval is putting people off research. BMJ
332: 238-238
[Full text]
-
Alphonso, N., Tan, C., Utley, M., Cameron, R., Dussek, J., Lang-Lazdunski, L., Treasure, T.
(2005). A prospective randomized controlled trial of suction versus non-suction to the under-water seal drains following lung resection. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.
27: 391-394
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Wade, D. T
(2005). Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey. BMJ
330: 468-471
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Ethics committees and Oncological Terrain: “Who controlls controllers?”.
- Sergio Stagnaro
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2004
[Full text]
- Are Ethics Committees Ethical?
- Peter A West
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2004
[Full text]
- Clinical audit does not escape the cosh
- Jonathan R Bayly
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2004
[Full text]
- Research governance
- Barbara A Sen
bmj.com, 31 Jul 2004
[Full text]
- Research Governance and multi-centre health services research.
- Thomas E Locker, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- ETHICS SHOULD BE UNIVERSAL AND IMPARTIAL
- Kaushal R Pandey
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Ethics committees are not the bad guys!
- Tim M Reynolds
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Time for institutional review boards?
- Tom Meagher
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- In research, one size will not fit all
- Peter N Furness
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- The view from a REC
- Jammi N Rao
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Will it ever recover from the blow?
- David L J Freed
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Frustrating Bureaucracy in Clinical Research
- Peter A Goulden
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Ethics committees
- John M Walshe
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Clinical Research: ethics committees are not the problem
- Anthony S. Wierzbicki
bmj.com, 17 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Palliative care research: catch 22
- Lara J Alloway, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Aug 2004
[Full text]
- Ethical Review - seeking a balance
- Sir John Pattison, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Aug 2004
[Full text]