Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:110 (10 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.110
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDespite research in tropical medicine being undertaken in countries from low human development index, authorship and editorial opinion remain with countries from higher development index. This unfair trend observed by Keiser et al demands to be addressed and overturned.1
|
|
Credit: BETTY PRESS/PANOS
|
This observed bias may arise because countries of high human development index fund the bulk of research in tropical medicine.2 3 Authors from these countries have prepared the grant applications, taken principal investigator status, and believe that they should take primary or terminal authorship. Researchers from low human development index countries can break this cycle only if they can obtain international funding themselves or are allowed authorship by the principal investigators. It seems this is rarely extended to the collaborators in tropical countries, even though they are the ones practically conducting the study.
If such generosity in authorship and mentorship were provided, this would enable researchers from
Ranjit Manchanda, specialist registrar obstetrics and gynaecology
Bedford Hospital, Bedford MK42 9DJ ranjitsupriya@yahoo.co.uk
Rajesh Varma, MRC fellow in obstetrics and gynaecology
Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG r.varma@bham.ac.uk