BMJ  2004;329:6-7 (3 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.6

Editorial

Collecting and sharing information about harms

Appropriate strategies to communicate this information are essential

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Prescribing a drug represents a trade-off between its benefits and harms. The harm to benefit ratio varies according to the condition being treated, the drug's pharmacology, and the availability and safety of other therapeutic options. A decision to prescribe a drug therefore has to be made on the basis of all the information available. There is, however, often an imbalance in such information. Although high quality data regarding benefits usually come from randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, and evidence synopses, information on harms may be limited. This is particularly the case for new drugs, which usually have been given to only a few thousand patients, and often for relatively short periods before licensing.1 This allows common adverse events to be detected, but not rare events or those that occur only with prolonged exposure. Consequently, established compounds continue to cause much harm2—for example, approximately 5% of all admissions to US . . . [Full text of this article]

Munir Pirmohamed, professor of clinical pharmacology

Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE (munirp@liv.ac.uk)

Janet Darbyshire, professor of epidemiology

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA (jhd@ctu.mrc.ac.uk)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Balancing benefits and harms in health care: Technology to collect and share information about harms already exists
Paul L Cervi
BMJ 2004 329: 457. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Balancing benefits and harms in health care: GPs need to be informed about drugs prescribed to their patients elsewhere
Pawan Randev
BMJ 2004 329: 457. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ohlsen, R., Williamson, R., Yusufi, B., Mullan, J., Irving, D., Mukherjee, S., Page, E., Aitchison, K., Barnes, T. (2008). Interrater reliability of the Antipsychotic Non-Neurological Side-Effects Rating Scale measured in patients treated with clozapine. J Psychopharmacol 22: 323-329 [Abstract]  
  • Veling, W., Selten, J.-P., Susser, E., Laan, W., Mackenbach, J. P, Hoek, H. W (2007). Discrimination and the incidence of psychotic disorders among ethnic minorities in The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol 36: 761-768 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Unreported adverse drug effects
susanne mccabe
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Noting Harms of treatments
Pawan Randev
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Early Detection of Adverse Events: CICERO - an Internet Proposal
Paul L Cervi
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Re: Unreported adverse drug effects
Helen Macqueen
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ