BMJ  2004;329:44-47 (3 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.44

Education and debate

Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions

Bruno HCh Stricker, professor of pharmacoepidemiology1, Bruce M Psaty, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and health services2

1 Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, 2 Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Correspondence to: B HCh Stricker b.stricker@erasmusmc.nl

The current system of verifying and quantifying adverse reactions to new drugs is too disparate. Epidemiological studies for testing a hypothesis have a part to play in protecting the public from the harmful effects of new drugs

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

Although some will question the use of the term experiment on formal grounds, most experts will likely agree that the widespread marketing of a new drug is in fact a large experiment on a population. This is especially the case when it concerns a novel molecular entity with potentially a new set of clinical experiences. As the marketing of new drugs includes the discovery of adverse effects, the public's health would be best protected by a complementary set of techniques for the detection, verification, and quantification of safety issues. Yet the current approach to this is scattered and disappointing. We discuss why healthcare professionals are not aware of all safety problems of a drug at its introduction and why pharmacoepidemiology should complement the indispensable observational method of case reporting.

Sources and selection criteria

Our review is based on a search of PubMed using the terms adverse effect, adverse reaction, ADR, adverse event, adverse reaction . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

Limitations of clinical trials

Adverse drug reactions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Pulmonary embolism in a patient taking clozapine
Vinod H Srihari and T Warren Lee
BMJ 2008 336: 1499-1501. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions—systematic literature survey of follow-up
Yoon Kong Loke, Deirdre Price, Sheena Derry, and Jeffrey K Aronson
BMJ 2006 332: 335-339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Balancing benefits and harms in health care: Technology to collect and share information about harms already exists
Paul L Cervi
BMJ 2004 329: 457. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Albavera-Hernandez, C., Rodriguez, J. M, Idrovo, A. J (2009). Safety of botulinum toxin type A among children with spasticity secondary to cerebral palsy: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Rehabil 23: 394-407 [Abstract]  
  • Giezen, T. J., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Straus, S. M. J. M., Schellekens, H., Leufkens, H. G. M., Egberts, A. C. G. (2008). Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for Biologicals Approved in the United States and the European Union. JAMA 300: 1887-1896 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Srihari, V. H, Lee, T W. (2008). Pulmonary embolism in a patient taking clozapine. BMJ 336: 1499-1501 [Full text]  
  • Isacson, D., Johansson, L., Bingefors, K. (2008). Nationwide Survey of Subjectively Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Sweden. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 42: 347-353 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Vohra, S., Johnston, B. C., Cramer, K., Humphreys, K. (2007). Adverse Events Associated With Pediatric Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 119: e275-e283 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Loke, Y. K., Price, D., Derry, S., Aronson, J. K (2006). Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up. BMJ 332: 335-339 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chou, R., Helfand, M. (2005). Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms. ANN INTERN MED 142: 1090-1099 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cervi, P. L (2004). Balancing benefits and harms in health care: Technology to collect and share information about harms already exists. BMJ 329: 457-457 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Detect adverse reactions before the drug goes on the market
Kieran M Walsh
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Re: Detect adverse reactions before the drug goes on the market
Nicholas D. Moore
bmj.com, 24 Sep 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ