BMJ 2004;329:44-47 (3 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.44
Education and debate
Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions
Bruno HCh Stricker, professor of pharmacoepidemiology1,
Bruce M Psaty, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and health services2
1 Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam,
2 Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
Correspondence to: B HCh Stricker b.stricker@erasmusmc.nl
The current system of verifying and quantifying adverse reactions to new drugs is too disparate. Epidemiological studies for testing a hypothesis have a part to play in protecting the public from the harmful effects of new drugs
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Introduction
Although some will question the use of the term experiment on
formal grounds, most experts will likely agree that the widespread
marketing of a new drug is in fact a large experiment on a population.
This is especially the case when it concerns a novel molecular
entity with potentially a new set of clinical experiences. As
the marketing of new drugs includes the discovery of adverse
effects, the public's health would be best protected by a complementary
set of techniques for the detection, verification, and quantification
of safety issues. Yet the current approach to this is scattered
and disappointing. We discuss why healthcare professionals are
not aware of all safety problems of a drug at its introduction
and why pharmacoepidemiology should complement the indispensable
observational method of case reporting.
Sources and selection criteria
Our review is based on a search of PubMed using the terms adverse
effect, adverse reaction, ADR, adverse event, adverse reaction
. . . [Full text of this article]-->
Limitations of clinical trials
Adverse drug reactions

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Pulmonary embolism in a patient taking clozapine
- Vinod H Srihari and T Warren Lee
BMJ 2008 336: 1499-1501.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactionssystematic literature survey of follow-up
- Yoon Kong Loke, Deirdre Price, Sheena Derry, and Jeffrey K Aronson
BMJ 2006 332: 335-339.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Balancing benefits and harms in health care: Technology to collect and share information about harms already exists
- Paul L Cervi
BMJ 2004 329: 457.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Albavera-Hernandez, C., Rodriguez, J. M, Idrovo, A. J
(2009). Safety of botulinum toxin type A among children with spasticity secondary to cerebral palsy: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Rehabil
23: 394-407
[Abstract]
-
Giezen, T. J., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Straus, S. M. J. M., Schellekens, H., Leufkens, H. G. M., Egberts, A. C. G.
(2008). Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for Biologicals Approved in the United States and the European Union. JAMA
300: 1887-1896
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Srihari, V. H, Lee, T W.
(2008). Pulmonary embolism in a patient taking clozapine. BMJ
336: 1499-1501
[Full text]
-
Isacson, D., Johansson, L., Bingefors, K.
(2008). Nationwide Survey of Subjectively Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Sweden. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 347-353
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Vohra, S., Johnston, B. C., Cramer, K., Humphreys, K.
(2007). Adverse Events Associated With Pediatric Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics
119: e275-e283
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Loke, Y. K., Price, D., Derry, S., Aronson, J. K
(2006). Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up. BMJ
332: 335-339
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Chou, R., Helfand, M.
(2005). Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms. ANN INTERN MED
142: 1090-1099
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Cervi, P. L
(2004). Balancing benefits and harms in health care: Technology to collect and share information about harms already exists. BMJ
329: 457-457
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Detect adverse reactions before the drug goes on the market
- Kieran M Walsh
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2004
[Full text]
- Re: Detect adverse reactions before the drug goes on the market
- Nicholas D. Moore
bmj.com, 24 Sep 2004
[Full text]