Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1510-1511 (26 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1510
New regulations are necessary to make useful research possible
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Many authorities have expressed reservations about some provisions in the human tissue bill, which parliament will debate again at the end of June. Although these general concerns remain relevant, we must draw attention to another issue that has been largely glossed overnamely, the use of tissue and genetic information obtained from people with mental incapacity. The human tissue bill is one of several pieces of legislation which in their current form are likely to make research involving adult patients with critical illness, learning disability, or mental illness, either difficult or impossible.
One of the central themes of the human tissue bill is that "appropriate consent" or "qualifying consent" must be obtained before tissue from a living person may be used, stored, or genetically analysed. Failure to do so constitutes a criminal offence. Where the tissue comes from a living adult, the person himself or herself must give the consent.1 This
Kathleen Liddell, lecturer, Faculty of Law
Cambridge Genetics Knowledge Park, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 8RN (k.liddell@law.cam.ac.uk)
David K Menon, professor of anaesthesia
Addenbrooke's NHS Trust Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
Ron Zimmern, director
Public Health Genetics Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN
Read all Rapid Responses