Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1499 (19 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1499-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIndia is widely believed to be on the verge of an epidemic of coronary heart disease, as expressed by Ghaffar et al in their clinical review.1 2 We believe this assumption to be based on weak evidence.
We found one meta-analysis, reporting a ninefold increase in urban India (1-9%) and twofold increase (2-4%) in rural India between the 1960s and 1990s.3 We believe these results to be inaccurate because of the poor quality of underlying data and because comparisons were based on studies defining coronary heart disease differently. Coronary heart disease was measured by using either Minnesota coded electrocardiograms or clinically defined using non-validated translations of the Rose angina questionnaire. The questionnaire tends to give greater positive results and is less valid in women and South Asian populations.4 5
Our review, which is currently undergoing peer review, focused on Minnesota coded electrocardiograms to provide an objective measure. We reviewed 31
Naseer Ahmad, house officer
c/o 89 Clitheroe Road, Manchester M13 0QU naseer102@hotmail.com
Raj Bhopal, professor of public health
Public Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG