Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1497 (19 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1497-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBhutta et al and the World Bank highlight Sri Lanka as a model in achieving exceptional health status with comparatively low investments.1 2 However, recent data show a stagnation of gains (such as an increase in infant mortality from 15.9/1000 in 1998 to 17/1000 in 2001) and emerging challenges.1 3 This requires the model to be suitably modified to lower the preventable morbidity and mortality, while responding to the emerging challenges. The following examples show that Sri Lanka is deviating in an ad hoc manner from the successful model of preventive programmes at a relatively equitable grassroots level.
The preventive sector is progressively underfunded, rather than strengthened to meet the epidemic of non-communicable diseases. From 1993 to 1999 expenditure on preventive and public health declined from 10% (of total health expenditures) to 6%, and expenditure dedicated to the curative sector has been maintained around 44% to 47%.4
Human resource development
Saroj Jayasinghe, associate professor
Faculty of Medicine, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka sarojoffice@yahoo.com
Read all Rapid Responses