Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1377-1378 (5 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1377-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe international effort to revise and reform academic medicine is timely and appropriate.1
In the past century the science of medicine has become a massive enterprise, fuelled by both government and industry money. But growth has also resulted in a separation of science from practitioners of the discipline. Most of today's major scientific health advances are created not by practising doctors but by people whose entire career is based in laboratories. Disciplinary boundaries in health care have become blurred so that many health professionals do well in roles previously thought to be medical roles. Several major reports have resulted in transformation in the processes of medical education so that curricula are now more student centred (problem based learning), more community based (to provide training in the milieu where practice will subsequently occur), and more inclusive of the social sciences than was the case in the past.
The 21st
Jean D Gray, professor emeritus
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3M 2B3 jeangray@hfx.eastlink.ca
Read all Rapid Responses