Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1377 (5 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1377
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORTugwell announces the campaign to revitalise academic medicine.1 I firmly believe that many academic leaders are not necessarily the role models or even the clinical leaders they should be. In particular, although many are outstanding scientists in a branch of the biomedical or even clinical sciences, it is rare for them to bring a truly academic perspective to their clinical work. That is, they rarely apply the rigorous principles of science to their clinical work, by questioning established dogma, testing new ways of doing things, or even evaluating clinical practices.
Without leadership in clinical work I believe that academic medicine is doomed to becoming increasingly less relevant to health care and more focused on biomedical science. Biomedical science is important, but I question whether biomedical scientists should be the academic medical leaders, with their attention elsewhere and not directly on improving health and health care and teaching others
Paddy A Phillips, head of medicine
Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia paddy.phillips@flinders.edu.au