Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1332 (5 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1332
Low turnout in elections sends a warning signal
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
On 1 April 2004 the first 10 NHS foundation trusts came into being while another 14 remain on the starting line, awaiting the approval of the independent regulator.1 So begins an experiment that has the potential to transform the NHS, but in which formidable obstacles remain in the way of translating ambitions into reality. In launching the experiment the government set out two linked aimsdecentralisation and democratisation.2 Firstly, foundation trust status would give providers "freedom from Whitehall control." Secondly, it would introduce "a new form of social ownership where health services are owned by and accountable to local people rather than to central government."2 We do not know how much freedom from Whitehall control will exist in practice and how much scope foundation trusts will have to develop new ways of working. During the passage of the legislation through parliament, the government was forced to appease backbench opposition by introducing
Rudolf Klein, visiting professor
London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE (rudolfklein30@aol.com)
Read all Rapid Responses