Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1328-1329 (5 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1328
Have their place but need to be evaluated and used to promote appropriate goals
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
George Bernard Shaw put it well. "That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg, is enough to make one despair..."1 The problem, according to Shaw, was that the profit motive and doctors' entrepreneurialism create the wrong incentives for good medical practice. The creation of the NHS solved the problem of perverse incentives. Or did it?
Certainly the NHS eliminates the need for practitioners to perform excessive medical procedures to achieve economic security. But all payment systems create incentives. They differ in strength, effect, and the activities they encourage. The NHS pays general practitioners in part by capitation to reward doctors who serve more patients. Since its creation the NHS has also provided distinction awardssalary premiums for a select
Marc A Rodwin, professor of law
Suffolk University Law School, 120 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02108, USA (mrodwin@suffolk.edu)
Read all Rapid Responses