Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1261 (22 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1261-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe publication of Igbokwe's letter equating paedophilia with homosexuality in the debate on treating homosexuality as a sickness is worrying.1 Although a debate on sexuality is positive (even if we do have to read misinformed and outdated views), it can serve to show both practitioners and the public that many general practitioners are still woefully ignorant about sexualityand other issues too. However, to permit the publication of Igbokwe's letter is distasteful.
Such views not only show ignorance but also contribute to homophobic abuse. I am saddened, but not surprised, to see the extent of homophobia and ignorance in Igbokwe's letter and elsewhere in this debate. But I am disgusted that a medical journal should publish and by doing so endorse, a letter linking homosexuality and paedophilia.
The job of health professionals is to provide care for the public. That public will include people with different sexual orientations, views,
Petra Boynton, lecturer in health services research
University College London, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Open Learning Unit, Archway Campus, London N19 5LW p.boynton@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses