Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1259-1260 (22 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1259-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe methods applied to enhance the interpretation of the data by Plowe et al deserve comment.1
The World Health Organization has developed several standardised protocols to assess the efficacy of antimalarial drugs, which are intended to determine treatment failures and not resistance patterns of the parasite. Recently, WHO published a revised protocol, giving clear indications of outcome classifications and the target groups (children under 5 years in intense transmission areas) to be monitored.2 The new classification is appropriate for patients with symptoms and includes not only clinical but also parasitological criteria. It becomes redundant now to report the response based on the 1973 classification. Moreover, examination of WHO's database on antimalarial drug efficacy has shown that early treatment failure corresponds closely to parasitological resistance grade RIII + RII, contradicting the authors' claim that early treatment failure is systematically overestimating the true early failure rate.
A technical meeting convened
P Ringwald, medical officer
Roll Back Malaria Department, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland ringwaldp@who.int