Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1211-1212 (22 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1211
"Informed consent" needs to be balanced against "freedom from discrimination"
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the public mind doctoring and homosexuality do not sit easily together. More than most occupations, medical practice is affected by powerful cultural stereotypes concerning the social identity of practitioners. As part of their work doctors have privileged access to their patients' bodies, and in return patients expect to know something of the social and moral character of the practitioner. In popular culture doctors have been represented as asexual or heterosexual, but rarely as a group that includes people who may have same sex relationships. We do not know how many health professionals self identify as lesbian, gay, and bisexual. Extrapolating from estimates for the general population, many commentators have quoted the figure from the American Kinsey studies of about 10%, although a recent national survey in the United Kingdom showed that only about 5% of both men and women had ever had a same sex partnership.1
2 The existence of
David Hughes, professor of health policy
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Studies, School of Health Science, University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP (d.hughes@swansea.ac.uk)
Read all Rapid Responses