BMJ  2004;328:1202-1203 (15 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1202-c

Letter

Alcohol evidence and policy

Alternative tax strategy is possible

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

EDITOR—Plant discussed the alcohol harm reduction strategy for England.1 Large tax increases may be politically unacceptable, but who could cavil at a progressive application of tax according to the amount of alcohol in the purchased item?

If alcohol were taxed at so many pence per gram (instead of per pint or bottle, as at present), then consumers could choose more readily between inexpensive low alcohol drinks and pricey high alcohol items. The price mechanism, which is known to work, would be used and a modicum of consumer education would take place with every visit to the bar or off-licence.

Analogous arguments apply to energy taxation policy—if energy were uniformly taxed at so many pence per kwh contained (whether the fuel be solid, liquid, gaseous, or electric current) then the true cost of our energy exploiting lives would become apparent and behaviour would change—rapidly.

Steven Ford, general practitioner principal

Haydon and Allen Valleys Medical Practice, Haydon Bridge, Northumberland NE47 6LA sford-hb@dircon.co.uk


Competing interests: None declared.

  1. Plant M. Alcohol harm reduction strategy for England. BMJ 2004;328: 905-6. (17 April.)[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The alcohol harm reduction strategy for England
Martin Plant
BMJ 2004 328: 905-906. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ