Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1201 (15 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1201-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe article by Wennberg et al on variation in the use of healthcare resources at the end of life raises several questions.1
It implies that the frequency of use of services is associated with workforce supply, but other studies contradict this. Supplier induced demand does not explain doctor variability in Norway,2 and economists have noted the methodological difficulty of making interpretations about supplier induced demand.3 Variability is still a major phenomenon in countries with centrally planned health systems which have less scope for inducement, such as the NHS in the United Kingdom. There is a fine interpretative line between healthcare activity that is induced by supply and healthcare activity that varies because some patients face inequitable barriers to access. Even if inducement is an issue in the United States, this interpretation may not be generalisable to other countries, given the market orientation of aspects of healthcare there.
The
Tom Love, research fellow
t.love@tcgp.dundee.ac.uk
Tom Fahey, professor
Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee DD2 4BF