Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1135 (8 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1135-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORReports of randomised trials should state clearly whether blinding was attempted, and if so who was blinded and how this was done.1 Fergusson et al note that blinding may be ineffective in some trials, making them less sound methodologically than they seem to be.2
But trial participants asked to guess the treatment they received might well be influenced by outcome. We might expect to see an apparent breaking of the blind more often in trials when the effect of treatment was a marked, for either an intended outcome or adverse effect. Indeed, end of trial tests of blindness might be tests of hunches for adverse effects or efficacy.3 4 Assessments of blinding success would be much more reliable in trials when they can be carried out before the clinical outcome has been determined.
Furthermore, those who successfully decipher assignments may disguise their unblinding actions.3
4 That difficulty, along with the
Douglas G Altman, director
Cancer Research UK Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford OX3 7LF doug.altman@cancer.org.uk
Kenneth F Schulz, vice president
Quantitative Sciences, Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
David Moher, director
Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.