BMJ  2004;328:1135 (8 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1135-a

Letter

Turning a blind eye

Testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Reports of randomised trials should state clearly whether blinding was attempted, and if so who was blinded and how this was done.1 Fergusson et al note that blinding may be ineffective in some trials, making them less sound methodologically than they seem to be.2

But trial participants asked to guess the treatment they received might well be influenced by outcome. We might expect to see an apparent breaking of the blind more often in trials when the effect of treatment was a marked, for either an intended outcome or adverse effect. Indeed, end of trial tests of blindness might be tests of hunches for adverse effects or efficacy.3 4 Assessments of blinding success would be much more reliable in trials when they can be carried out before the clinical outcome has been determined.

Furthermore, those who successfully decipher assignments may disguise their unblinding actions.3 4 That difficulty, along with the . . . [Full text of this article]

Douglas G Altman, director

Cancer Research UK Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford OX3 7LF doug.altman@cancer.org.uk

Kenneth F Schulz, vice president

Quantitative Sciences, Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

David Moher, director

Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials
Dean Fergusson, Kathleen Cranley Glass, Duff Waring, and Stan Shapiro
BMJ 2004 328: 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., for the CONSORT Group, (2008). Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 148: 295-309 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wagena, E. J., Knipschild, P. G., Huibers, M. J. H., Wouters, E. F. M., van Schayck, C. P. (2005). Efficacy of Bupropion and Nortriptyline for Smoking Cessation Among People at Risk for or With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Arch Intern Med 165: 2286-2292 [Abstract] [Full text]  

What's new
Student BMJ poll

Resources
Tools
Online poll
Find out more
See previous polls
Services

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.
Print issues


Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview