Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1133 (8 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1133-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORChikwe et al's description of surgical training in the United Kingdom is a damning indictment of the politicians and medical leaders whose decisions have resulted in the present shambles.1 The content and duration of surgical training should have been solely the responsibility of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons. Instead politicians have sought to diminish the authority of these colleges, as well as undermining the independence of the medical profession in general. Furthermore, they have adopted European working time legislation with no regard for its impact on medical training and continuity of care.
Senior medical figures are also culpable. Despite the current crisis the chief medical officer is trying to introduce an even more abbreviated form of consultant training. If successful he will further devalue postgraduate medical training in the United Kingdom. Elsewhere postgraduate deans have failed to address the obvious problems, and their current tinkering with the junior
Alan M Leaman, consultant in accident and emergency medicine
Shrewsbury, Shropshire SY5 7DP caleaman@doctors.org.uk