BMJ  2004;328:1074 (1 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1074-b

Letter

Response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats

Renunciation of nuclear weapons could lessen the threat

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—We agree with Turai et al in their review of the medical response to radiation incidents that the use of nuclear weapons is currently unlikely,1 but we are concerned that recent developments could lower the nuclear threshold worldwide.

First hydrogen bomb, Semipalatinsk, 1953

Credit: PAUL LOWE/PANOS

Some 20 000 nuclear weapons are active today, many on high alert. Each is several times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb, which if used on a major city in the United Kingdom would overwhelm medical services.2 The United States is planning "bunker busters" or "mini nukes," officially known as "low yield earth penetrating weapons," claiming that their use would cause less "collateral damage" from blast or heat than existing nuclear weapons. However, "venting" would produce major fallout over several square kilometres downwind, causing hundreds of cases of radiation sickness in urban areas.3

Health workers can support an initiative towards reducing the . . . [Full text of this article]

Douglas Holdstock, honorary secretary

Medact, Grayston Centre, London N1 6HT info@medact.org

Elizabeth Waterston, convenor, nuclear hazards group

Medact, Grayston Centre, London N1 6HT info@medact.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Medical response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats
István Turai, Katalin Veress, Bengül Günalp, and Gennadi Souchkevitch
BMJ 2004 328: 568-572. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ