BMJ  2004;328:1074 (1 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1074

Letter

Response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats

Medical treatment should be given only when safe to do so

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Turai et al reviewed the medical response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats.¹ Puzzlingly, they say that providing care for a patient in a life threatening condition always has priority over decontamination from radioactive materials or those actions required for the safety of others involved (medical staff, emergency rescue teams) or related to the wider public and environment.¹ I disagree.

This statement will encourage inexperienced staff to disregard the safety of themselves and others in a "heroic" attempt to treat those ill and injured. The latest edition of the Major Incident Medical Management and Support Course rightly emphasises self and scene safety over that of survivors.² Experience has shown again and again that well meaning but poorly trained or equipped rescue and medical staff are highly likely to become further victims.³ As an example, the article points out that some of the 28 radiation deaths from the Chernobyl . . . [Full text of this article]

Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW Jonathan.Benger@ubht.swest.nhs.uk

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Medical response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats

István Turai, Katalin Veress, Bengül Günalp, and Gennadi Souchkevitch
BMJ 2004 328: 568-572. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]