Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1016 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1016-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMost of the 50 or so correspondents agreed that doctors are guilty of using treatments that don't work.1-3 Some thought that patients respond very differently to the same treatment, so what works in one might not work in another. And sometimes useless, but harmless, treatment bought much needed time for patients to heal themselves, suggested others.
But many simply felt that culture and training and peer pressure and patient expectations often got in the way of change, even when patients stand to benefit. Financial imperatives, some of which are not always obvious, also favour using treatments that don't work, suggested an ethicist in Qatar. The lack of published negative trial results didn't help much either, volunteered a professor of psychiatry from India.
Just because everyone is doing it, doesn't mean it's right, it was acknowledged. But deviating from accepted practice or long held traditions, for which a great
Caroline White, freelance medical journalist
London E17 4SQ
Read all Rapid Responses