Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1015 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7446.1015-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAssessing effectiveness and benefit in epidemiological studies entails several degrees of imprecision and uncertainty at the individual level while its estimator is defined for a population. A single disease entity may have varied manifestations in different patients and divergent outcomes.1
|
As Anderson and Groves emphasise,2 Archie Cochrane posed three key questions to ask about a healthcare intervention: "Can it work?" "Does it work in practice?" and "Is it worth it?" We usually use rules to decide between "yes," "not sure," and "no." By doing this we assume Aristotelian logic and the classic current definition that "health and disease are opposites and that they are dual and contradictory attributes."1
Why do doctors use treatments that do not work?3 People usually do not require precise numerical information, and yet they are capable of making decisions. They accept noisy and imprecise input4; so do doctors.
Having a huge number of
Ludovic Reveiz, coordinator of general practice
Colsánitas, Cons Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogota, Colombia lureveiz@colsanitas.com