Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:945 (17 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7445.945
Allan D Struthers, professor of cardiovascular medicine and therapeutics1
1 Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY a.d.struthers@dundee.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
One of the key skills of a good diagnostician is to spot when a patient's case has enough atypical features for there to be a strong chance that the "obvious" diagnosis might be wrong. This suspicion would lead a good diagnostician to perform extra investigations.
In this case, the normal electrocardiographic appearance virtually excluded the possibility of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (figure). The other less reliable atypical features were the lack of any history of ischaemic heart disease and the lack of any response to furosemide (although the dose might not have been high enough). Of course, these alerting, atypical features had to be balanced against all the positive features suggesting heart failure: hypertension, pansystolic murmur, raised jugular venous pressure, pleural effusions, and possible cardiomegaly.
| |||||||||||
It was somewhat unusual that an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor was given before the result of echocardiography was
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+