Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:770 (27 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.770
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORUK asylum seekers and refugees have the same rights to health care as the settled population. None the less, refugees report difficulties accessing health carefor example, in registering with a general practitioner.1 They are also sometimes registered as temporary residents, which is detrimental for continuity of care.2
We sent a postal questionnaire to all 129 general practitioners in Lothian, an area in Scotland with an estimated 3000 refugees. It focused on the need for extra funding for general practices with refugees, the best place for providing primary care services, and the need for training.
Ninety five responses were received (a response rate of 73.6%). The table summarises the results (see bmj.com for more details).3
|
About one third of general practitioners had treated refugees, but few staff had undergone training. Of 82
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, final year medical student
22 Appletree Close, Liverpool L18 9XN S.V.Katikireddi@sms.ed.ac.uk
Raj Bhopal, professor of public health
Public Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG raj.bhopal@ed.ac.uk
Julia A Quickfall, nurse director
Queen's Nursing Institute Scotland, Edinburgh EH1 2EL