Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:766 (27 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.766
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOROne of the controversies that has recently arisen in cases of alleged shaken baby syndrome concerns the disparity between certain neuropathological findings at necropsy and whether these findings are consistent with the entity regarded as the shaken baby syndrome.
A database was collected for more than five years of documented Scottish cases of suspected non-accidental head injury diagnosed after a multiagency assessment and including cases with uncoerced confessions of perpetrators and criminal convictions. Several patterns of presentation allow delineation of cases into four predominant types.
Hyperacute encephalopathy (cervicomedullary syndrome)
This hyperacute encephalopathy (6% of all cases) results from extreme "whiplashing" forces, the infant suffering the equivalent of a broken neck or, more correctly, a broken brain stem. In infants with a median survival of one day Geddes et al described localised axonal damage at the craniocervical junction, in the corticospinal tracts, and in the cervical cord roots, consistent with hyperflexion and hyperextension
Acute encephalopathy
Subacute non-encephalopathic presentation
Chronic extracerebral presentation
Conclusions
Robert A Minns, consultant paediatric neurologist
Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh and Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh EH9 1LF Robert.Minns@ed.ac.uk
Anthony Busuttil, professor of forensic medicine
Forensic Medicine Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG
Read all Rapid Responses