Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:642-643 (13 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7440.642-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORGarry et al showed that laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major complications than was abdominal hysterectomy.1 Can two techniques be compared, however, when one has been used for 100 years and the other for only a few months?
We found that in a group of surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery for more than 10 years the learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy is much greater than 25 cases, particularly when studying infrequent major complications.2 3
Comparing patients operated on between 1989 and 1995 with those operated on between 1996 and 1999, we found that the incidence of conversion to laparotomy decreased from 4.7% (33 cases out of 695) to 1.4% (13 cases out of 952), the incidence of major complications from 5.6% to 1.3%, and the operating time from 115 minutes to 90 minutes. The percentage of laparoscopic hysterectomy among non-vaginal hysterectomies, however, increased from 68% to
M J Canis, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology
mcanis@chuclermontferrand.fr
A Wattiez, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology
G Mage, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology
M A Bruhat, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology
Polyclinique CHU, Boulevard Léon Malfreyt, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, France