Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:642 (13 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7440.642-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAlthough Garry et al look closely at outcomes for different surgical techniques in hysterectomy, I am concerned about the criteria they use to classify major complications.1
It is routine practice, at least in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, to seek patients' consent for conversion to an open procedure. This is recognised as prudent if persisting with the laparoscopic approach would add risk. To classify a strategy that encourages caution as a major complication therefore runs the risk of dissuading surgeons from converting appropriately and in a timely manner. In addition, it may open the way for complaints and litigation should a laparotomy be required.
It is widely accepted in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery that, although conversion rates should be kept as low as possible and audited appropriately, conversion to an open procedure in itself is not a major complication. The particular problem encountered may arise from the disease process or from an
-->
Simon W Atkinson, consultant upper gastrointestinal surgeon
Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH s.atkinson80@ntlworld.com