Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:590 (6 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7439.590-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The internet is generally regarded as a democratic medium, a marketplace of information open to anyone with a mouse and a modem. It is surprising, then, that sites about the effects on health of organisational downsizingthe subject of a paper in this week's BMJ (p 555)seem stacked more in employers' than in employees' favour. While there are several papers available online showing that downsizing can adversely affect healthsearch "the world's largest online library" (www.questia.com) or PubMed Central (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/) for thesecampaigning sites seem scarce. Instead, searching on www.google.com brings up links sponsored by companies offering occupational health services to businesses to help them, for example, reduce cost of sickness absence or "rehabilitate" stressed or absent employees (www.healthmanltd.com/ and www.matrix-ms.com/).
However, there are some interesting online initiatives. Timesizing.com is a US-based site that campaigns to downsize the working week rather than the workforce (
Trevor Jackson, assistant editor
BMJ tjackson@bmj.com